The world has lost more than one quarter of its land-dwelling insects in the past 30 years, researchers say. Their study of global insect decline paints a disturbing but more nuanced picture of the problem than earlier research.
Insects are disappearing at a rate of just under 1 per cent a year, with much variation from place to place, according to a study in the journal Science. That is a smaller population decline than found by some localised studies, which had triggered fears of a so-called insect apocalypse.
But it still adds up to something “awfully alarming,” said entomologist Roel van Klink of the German Centre for Integrative Biology, the study’s lead author.
Read more about insect decline:
“The decline across insect orders on land is jaw dropping,” said Michigan State University butterfly expert Nick Haddad, who was not part of the study.
“Ongoing decline on land at this rate will be catastrophic for ecological systems and for humans. Insects are pollinators, natural enemies of pests, decomposers and besides that, are critical to functioning of all Earth’s ecosystems.”
Insect declines are worst in North America, especially the Midwestern United States, and in parts of Europe, but the drop appears to be levelling off in the US in recent years, said the study, which pulled together earlier research on more than 10,000 species with data from 1,676 locations.
The Midwest lost 4 per cent of its insects a year. The big global losses seem to be around urban and suburban areas and croplands, where insects are losing their food and habitat, van Klink said.
University of Delaware entomologist Douglas Tallamy, who was not part of the study, said he would drive through the Midwest where there were supposed to be lots of butterflies and other insects but would see only corn and soybeans in an insect desert.
Some outside scientists said the results made sense, but worried that the study lacked research and data from some large areas, such as the tropics and Africa.
Co-author Ann Swengel, a citizen scientist who has tracked butterflies for more than 30 years, recalled that when driving around Wisconsin a few decades ago, she would “look out in a field and you’d see all these sulphur butterflies around. I can’t think of the last time that I’ve seen that”.
The study detailed quite different losses from place to place and from decade to decade. That tells scientists that “we’re not looking for a single stressor or we’re not looking a global phenomenon that is stressing insects in the same way”, said University of Connecticut insect expert David Wagner, who was not part of the study. What is happening, he said, is “absolutely intolerable”.
Mr Van Klink did not find a link to climate change in the insect loss. But he did see an overarching theme of creeping urbanisation, which absorbs land where insects live and eat, and general loss of habitat from farming that takes away weeds and flowers bugs need.
While land bugs were dwindling, freshwater insects, such as mayflies, dragonflies and mosquitoes, are increasing at more than 1 per cent a year, the study found. That is faster than land insects were disappearing. But those thriving freshwater insects are a tiny percentage of insects in the world.
That improvement of freshwater species, probably because rivers and streams got cleaner, shows hope, scientists said.
Reader Q&A: Could we survive without insects?
Asked by: Richard O’Neill, Glasgow
It would be very difficult. Insects pollinate at least a third of the total volume of crops cultivated worldwide, and many are useful predators of non-insect pests such as mites. Even if we managed to convert agriculture to purely wind-pollinated crops we would have to deal with an even more fundamental problem: the complete collapse of most ecosystems.
The total biomass of insects vastly outstrips the mass of all vertebrates so insects are a vital part of most food webs. Without insects for them to eat, we would lose most reptiles and amphibians and about half of all the bird species.
Insects are also a very important part of the decomposition process that returns nutrients from dead plants and animals to the soil. The environmental catastrophe that resulted would probably totally disrupt agriculture for decades or more and leave us almost entirely dependent on the sea for food.